where did I claim to challenge the hegemony? Whether I do, and whether I say are two different things…

I do not fear the open stage of the internet with this so far, as I do not see how what was intended as a humourous post to highlight how even the most ridiculous of theories could be supported through cross-referencing, could possibly be a “danger to the entire English language” or spur forth the impetus to create an e-mail address personally attacking someone you do not or can not engage with in person. Particularly when the e-mail account will soon be shut down due to breaching terms of service agreements. Your IP address has also been logged if I really need to pursue the issue further.

The post was a joke, purely for entertainment value for the few that follow this blog. The best defence is a good offence in my opinion, so my advice to you is to write wonderful literature and save the English language that way, rather than flaming on a blog anonymously.

As a poet, who preclaims to be outspoken and challenge the concepts of the pre-established hegemony, and who in this very post speaks out about danger to our civil liberties, is encroaching on free speech truly the best way to achieve your aims?

Should you fear the open stage of the internet, and by all accounts the numerous readers of this blog, I would be happy to continue this via private email. The above adress is active and correct.